home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Atari Mega Archive 1
/
Atari Mega Archive - Volume 1.iso
/
lists
/
gem
/
l_1199
/
1124
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-08-27
|
2KB
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 1994 08:43:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rick Flashman <rflashma@mhc.mtholyoke.edu>
Subject: RE: Re: Scope of an APP_DEFS file
To: gem-list@world.std.com
In-Reply-To: <9407290748.AA09473@getafix.oasis.icl.co.uk>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9407290814.B13067-0100000@mhc.mtholyoke.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
On Fri, 29 Jul 1994 d.oakley.kid0111@oasis.icl.co.uk wrote:
> Windows in Dialogs is in my list because programs like Interface
> allow you to have modal dialogs in windows or just dialogs. The
> advantage of not using dialogs is speed - when you are updating
> 20 items and have to bring up a dialog for each one, the small
> wait involved while the window draws can get annoying.
That must depend on code speed. I can't see any noticeable difference in
opening a windowed dialog vs. a regular dialog under Geneva (that's on an
8mhz 68000). I would guess that if someone else's code is slow, that can
be improved.
> This is all up for debate but things like that are usually saved in the
> program's own preferences file, and I take it that APP_DEFS conforming
> programs will not use their own preference files: Am I right or wrong?
I disagree. Programs like Geneva and NeoDesk keep a substancial amount of
additional information (everything from a program_flag list for Geneva to
dialog_positions for NeoDesk). I doubt you would want an APP_DEFS file
overwhelmed by all that application specific stuff.
--
Rick Flashman, Gribnif Software Tel 413.247.5620
P.O. Box 779, Northampton, MA 01061-0779 Fax 413.247.5622
For customer support/information please email "gribnif@genie.geis.com".